Effectiveness of Racial Profiling in Countering Terrorism

Students Name Professors Name Subject Code and Title Is racial Profiling an Effective Counter Terrorism card? The September 11 nemesis attack on the American soil was followed by a ensuant wave of events that were aimed at sound reflectioning scareism. As the global skirmish on terrorist act intensified, racial pen became more than(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) pronounced along the corridors of counter- terrorist act. Conversely, the employment of racial com convey as an instrument for detecting terror suspects and countering terrorism has elicited sharp criticism from different quarters.Even as protagonists of racial indite reiterate its efficaciousness in combating terrorism, dissenting voices lament the flagrant human rights violations and racial segregations borne of racial write. This paper critically examines the issues surrounding racial compose in order to form a benchmark upon which the effectiveness of racial compose in countering terrorism can be m easured. The September 11 attacks on the US soil, which was one of the individual(a) welt guesss of terrorism in the worlds history, led to the re-emergence of racial profiling in full force.In a desperate safari to bring to book the perpetrators of these attacks, security agencies in the US developed prejudice on Middle-Easterners. These prejudices were then systematise into law including additional security measures for Arabs and Muslims leaving and entrance the US territory. It is against this backdrop that racial profiling gained excrescence not only in the US entirely also among its al trickerys. This then raises a very apt(p) concern as to whether racial profiling is effective in countering terrorism across the globe.Security organs more often than not make ground cargo deck and interdiction of suspects primarily on the basis of their race, ethnicity and/or religion. Pickering et al argue that racial profiling occurs against the doctrine that certain minority grou ps be more apparent to engage in unlawful behavior. They further limit that integrating national security into law has open(a) up the incident that racial profiling is ineluctable in predicting crime and identifying potential perpetrators of crime.Profiling is however involved in terms of its effectiveness given the circumstance that it is not prime(prenominal)ly correlated statistically to risk. Secondly, racial profiling is ineffective in substantially dwindling down a pool of potential suspects (60). Therefore, profiling of suspects fails to meet professional law enforcement principles unless sort of reflect prejudice and discrimination. Nevertheless, the biggest concerns over profiling lie in the invasion of privacy as puff up as the erosion of fundamental civil liberties.The US has been on the forefront in advocating for the share-out of rider Name Records (PNR) information in an effort to single out possible terror suspects. However, this action forever subjects individuals of particular ethnicities and religions to additional security checks consequently tolerant lee charge to arbitrary discrimination (Muffler 241). What authorities do is basically identify names on the PNR that are Muslim or Arabic in nature. With the lore that Arabs and Muslims are potential terror suspects, they subject bearers of such(prenominal) names to more rigorous security screening.This act does not only discriminate affected individuals but it also produces a large number of treacherously positives. Pickering et al move over ascertained that large add up of false positives divert resources needed to enhance more productive law enforcement activities. Moreover, false positives draws attention away from real threats and this is welcome news for terrorists. To that respect, racial profiling becomes self-defeating in the sense that it overlooks mainstream target groups therefrom ignoring the real danger of homegrown non-target terror groups (62).In the moder n past, we have had terror attacks instigated by native citizens who have been either inspired by ancestor unearthly teachings or who are angry with their governments for reasons known to themselves. These individuals are never prioritized by the authorities thus pose a greater danger to national security. Over-emphasis on strangeers paves way for homegrown extremists to plan and execute terror attacks undetected. It is therefore a morally repugnant praxis to target individuals as terror suspects based on their race and/or religion.Not all Muslims are terrorists and neither are all quite a little of Arabic dividing line terrorists. It is really fallacious to generalize Muslims and Arabs as terrorists based on religious and ethnic prejudices. This then federal agency that these individuals who would have otherwise provided intelligence on terror activities become sympathetic to terror groups with whom they share racial and religious inclinations. In the long run, racial profil ing degrades social cohesion it fuels animosity and ends up instigating more terror attacks that it intended to counter in the first place (Pickering et al 62).racial alienation in the rout out of racial profiling has given rise to a new phenomenon referred to as social terrorism. Intolerance undergo in society today has left victims of racial profiling with indelible marks of acute, episodic and vicarious discrimination. social terrorism shutters minds, bodies and souls with affected individuals developing full spiritual disturbances. These disorders may include questioning the amount of living, cessation from religious practices as well as loss of vitality and aliveness.Spirituality in particular is at the heart of resilience to adversity among people of color. contend a persons spiritual beliefs therefore creates individuals prone to radical religious teachings. It is the victims of social terrorism that have been fix to cause the worst atrocities against humanity since th ey have nothing to lose after all (Etiony 97). Profiling then increases the detection of terrorists attack in the short run. with racial profiling, terror suspects have been apprehended forrader initiating their attacks.In the long run however, racial profiling creates the possibility of dangerous substitution. On the current trajectory, there is no empirical evidence whatsoever exploring the use of racial profiling as a counter terrorism measure. This means that we have no idea whether racial profiling is indeed bearing fruits in countering terrorism or not. What we are awarfaree of is how racial profiling has negatively impacted those subjected to it (Center for Human Rights and Global legal expert 19).It is not my intention to ruffle peoples feathers the wrong way or even stir still waters. To that respect, I will try my very best to pass off friendly skies friendly by condemning terrorism unreservedly with the strongest words possible. Terrorism destabilizes democracies by fight the life and liberties of citizens. It must be met with firmness and change magnitude co-operation among democratic countries. However, inasmuch as we must counter terrorism, we must denounce the escalation of barbaric acts that strike down honest victims.People do not immigrate to foreign lands besides to bomb them but they rather do so to appreciate the quality of life in these foreign countries. It is therefore incumbent upon the citizens of resident countries to welcome these foreigners and jockstrap them integrate in their communities. When all is said and done, it is urgent that we win the war on terrorism if we impulse to make the world a peaceful haven. This war will not however be won through covert and coercive methods of intelligence gathering. uprightness enforcement agencies must desist from hiding their laziness and inefficiencies can buoy racial bigotry.What is needed is development of security structures for sharing intelligence between security age nts and citizens on counter terror activities. Security agencies can no yearlong afford to guard terrorism as a top secret since terrorism affects all people regardless of their status in society. Fundamental rights must never become casualties of the politics of fear that have characterized States response to the war on terror. A penny-pinching adherence to human rights incorporated in international, regional, and national law is the only sure way of securing and protect all persons.Works Cited Center for Human Rights and Global Justice. irreversible Consequences Racial Profiling and Lethal Force in the War on Terror. NY NYU School of Law, 2006. Print. Etiony, Aldarando. Advancing Social Justice Through Clinical Practice. NJ Lawrence Eribaum Associates, 2008. Print. Muffler, J. Steven. Racial Profiling Issues, Data and Analyses. NY Nova Science P, 2006. Print. Pickering, Sharon, McCulloch and Wright-Neville David. Counter-Terrorism Policing Community, Cohesion and Security. NY S pringer, 2008. Print.